This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
Bond Law Review
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Article
    • Book Review
    • Case Note
    • Case Summary
    • Comment
    • Commentary
    • Commentary - Non-peer reviewed
    • Feature - Non-peer reviewed
    • Foreword
    • Multimedia
    • Obituary
    • Opinion
    • Practice Note
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • search
  • X (formerly Twitter) (opens in a new tab)
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:16054/feed
P-ISSN 1033-4505
E-ISSN 2202-4824
Article
Vol. 29, Issue 2, 2017January 01, 2017 AEST

Collaborating with Students to Create Law Assessment: A Case Study

Alex Deagon,
learningcollaborativestrategy
Copyright Logoccby-nc-nd-4.0 • https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.5654

Articles in Vol. 29, Issue 2, 2017

Vol. 29, Issue 2, 2017
  • Majoritarianism
    James Allan
  • Trial by Motive
    David Field
  • Collaborating with Students to Create Law Assessment: A Case Study
    Alex Deagon
  • Sexism at the Bar and the Equitable Briefing Policy:A Well-Meaning but Misguided Response to Gendered Briefing Practices
    Ryan Chan
Bond Law Review
Deagon, Alex. 2017. “Collaborating with Students to Create Law Assessment: A Case Study.” Bond Law Review 29 (2). https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.5654.
Save article as...▾

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system