Skip to main content
Bond Law Review
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Article
    • Book Review
    • Case Summary
    • Comment
    • Commentary
    • Commentary - Non-peer reviewed
    • Feature - Non-peer reviewed
    • Foreword
    • Multimedia
    • Obituary
    • Opinion
    • Practice Note
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • search
  • X (formerly Twitter) (opens in a new tab)
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:3339/feed
P-ISSN 1033-4505
E-ISSN 2202-4824
Article
Vol. 29, Issue 2, 2017June 01, 2017 AEST

Sexism at the Bar and the Equitable Briefing Policy:A Well-Meaning but Misguided Response to Gendered Briefing Practices

Ryan Chan,
aptitudesadvocacybaraustralialaw council
Copyright Logoccby-nc-nd-4.0 • https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.5954
Bond Law Review
Chan, Ryan. 2017. “Sexism at the Bar and the Equitable Briefing Policy:A Well-Meaning but Misguided Response to Gendered Briefing Practices.” Bond Law Review 29 (2): 1–30. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.53300/​001c.5954.

View more stats

This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

cookies
cookies
cookies
Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system