P-ISSN 1033-4505
E-ISSN 2202-4824
Vol. 37, Issue 2, 2025September 10, 2025 AEST
ccby-nc-nd-4.0
An ‘Each-Way’ Bet on Kakavas: Can Constructive Knowledge Support a Finding of Unconscionable Conduct in Commercial or Non-Commercial Cases in Equity?
An ‘Each-Way’ Bet on Kakavas: Can Constructive Knowledge Support a Finding of Unconscionable Conduct in Commercial or Non-Commercial Cases in Equity?
equitable estoppelconstructive knowledgeknowledge element for equitable estoppelKakavas v Crown MelbourneThorne v KennedyStubbings v Jams 2 Pty LtdNitopi v NitopiGunn v Meiners
Articles in Vol. 37, Issue 2, 2025
Vol. 37, Issue 2, 2025
- An 'Each-Way' Bet on Kakavas: Can Constructive Knowledge Support a Finding of Unconscionable Conduct in Commercial or Non-Commercial Cases in Equity?Ashlyn ViceShannon CampbellFrancesco de Zwart
- The End of Law lectures? Not Yet ...Melanie JacksonNickolas JamesJessica SchafferTonya Roberts
- Capital Gains Tax and Bankruptcy: A Minefield for Trustees in BankruptcyAaron Whittenbury
- An Australian Fourteenth Amendment: Rights, Citizenship and Constitutional ChangeCameron Jean Charles Shamsabad
Ashlyn Vice, Shannon Campbell & Francesco de Zwart, An ‘Each-Way’ Bet on Kakavas: Can Constructive Knowledge Support a Finding of Unconscionable Conduct in Commercial or Non-Commercial Cases in Equity?, 37 Bond Law Review 1 (2025).